Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Interruption sucks, interaction rocks

Radio ads. Billboards. Wall Posters. Yellow pages. Pamphlets. Leaflets. Brochures. TV commercials. Newspapers ads. Magazine ads. Pop ups. Fax Outs. Hiring a fat guy to stand out on the street corner during traffic with a big sandwich board three blocks down the street from your restaurant. Pitching the media to do stories about you. Standing at a big flashy booth at a trade show giving away free pens. Blinking web ads. Direct Email. Cold calls (pictured). Direct Mail. Driving down the street, slowing down in front of pedestrians, rolling down your window and asking them, “Hey, you wanna buy a home stereo?”

That last example actually happened to me last week while walking down the street in downtown Chicago. It was ridiculous!

And it got me thinking: what do all of those marketing techniques have in common?

Not all the time, but for the most part:

• They suck
• They annoy people
• They cost money
• They waste money
• They waste trees
• They are antiquated, boring and ineffective marketing channels created around interruption

Interruption, I say!

And they don’t work any more.

Because people are tired of being interrupted and being YELLED AT to buy stuff.

Bestselling author Seth Godin first noticed this trend in 1998. His revolutionary interview in FastCompany magazine quoted him as saying, “There's too much going on in our lives for us to enjoy being interrupted anymore. So, our natural response is to ignore the interruptions.”

Gets worse.

In 2004, a UCLA study reported that the average consumer sees 3000 marketing messages in one day. Course, that was a few years ago. By now, I bet it’s well over 5000.

Interruption.

This word has been on my mind a lot lately, and here’s why…

See, tomorrow is November 1st. Which means my company will celebrate its four-year anniversary in a few months. (Woo hoo!)

Now, I will tell you that, for the few years of my company’s existence, I didn’t make much money.

OK, fine. I didn’t make ANY money.

However, 2006 was a stellar year. I almost tripled my projected revenue. I surpassed most of my year-end goals by October. I even managed to take some time off! (Double woo hoo!)

And so to me, I take this as a sign that my marketing efforts are (finally!) paying off.

But, I have a confession to make. In fact, I have three of them.

In the history of my career as an entrepreneur:

1) I’ve never made a cold call.
2) I’ve never run an advertisement.
3) I’ve never “pitched” the media.

I know. Doesn’t seem normal, does it?

Well, that’s just the way I do business.

Because any day of the week, I’d rather: concentrate my marketing efforts on creating a sense of attraction, a sense of gravity; that magnetizes customers, prospects and fans toward my company through a process of delivering value in the vehicle known as my brand...

...than run some crappy ad. Or interrupt someone’s day with an annoying cold call. Or send out a direct mail piece. Or...

You get the point: interruption.

Therefore, if interruption is the enemy of successful marketing, what’s the ally?

My theory: interaction.

Look. I’ve been wearing a nametag 24-7 for just over 6 years now. And if there’s one thing I’ve learned from tens of thousands of encounters - with new people I otherwise never would have met – it’s this: interruption sucks, interaction rocks.

Now, what exactly do I mean by interaction? I’m talking about direct contact with your customers and prospects. Building community. Making friends. Creating and keeping fans. Hanging out. Delivering value. Developing relationships.

Specifically, stuff like...

Posting on your blog. Commenting on somebody else’s blog. Publishing articles in your community’s newspaper. Giving speeches at Chamber meetings. Lunches with friends. Lunches with customers. Lunches with potential customers. Publishing an ezine. Doing an audio podcast. Chat rooms. Bulletin boards. Speaking at trade shows. Attending networking functions. Doing a video podcast. Posting your pictures on Flickr. Instant messaging. Widgets. RSS feeds. MySpace. MyYearbook. Tagworld. Digg. Delicious. Squidoo. LinkdIn. Flickr. Wikipedia. Friendster. Facebook. LiveJournal. Match.com. Online discussion boards. Facilitating word of mouth. Throwing an open house or party at your office. Doing an interview on the radio. Going on a talk show. Talking to strangers!

And the list goes on an on.

So. Big question of the day: what do all of those marketing channels have in common?

Not all the time, but for the most part:

• They’re fun
• They connect with people
• They cost little or no money
• They save money
• They save time
• They are fresh, cool and effective marketing created around interaction

Interaction, I say!

And they work. They work really, really, really well.

Because customers are excited about interacting and participating with cool stuff, people and ideas that make them feel comfortable and respected.

So, I said it once and I’ll say it again: interruption sucks, interaction rocks.

(This post was inspired by Andy Sernovitz's kick-ass new book.)

LET ME ASK YA THIS…
Is your marketing interrupting or interacting?

LET ME SUGGEST THIS…
Make a list of 10 possible interaction marketing channels. Post them here!

* * * *
Scott Ginsberg
Author/Speaker/That Guy with the Nametag
www.hellomynameisscott.com

add to del.icio.us * digg it! * email this post

Labels: , , ,

8 Comments

print post email post

8 Comments:

At 8:30 AM, Anonymous Steve Green said...

Well, to be honest, my marketing is very ‘interruptive’. That’s the problem. What’s the solution? Networking. Friendship. And of course, being available.

10 possible interaction marketing channels?

1. Chamber of Commerce
2. Any civic breakfast/lunch/dinner
3. Service clubs
4. Fraternal organizations (I’m a Freemason)
5. Blogging
6. Posting on others blogs (hey, I guess I get that one for today)
7. Seeing a need/problem/issue, and without expectation of pay, working on it.
8. Inviting folks to participate in anything.
9. Participating in things others extend and invitation to
10. Wear a name-tag (I’m a real estate agent. We know how to wear name-tags)

 
At 8:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Scott, to a certain extent, I disagree with your statement of: "what do all of those marketing techniques have in common?

A few things, really:

• They suck
• They annoy people
• They cost money
• They waste money
• They waste trees
• They are antiquated, boring and ineffective marketing channels created around interruption"

Scott, they do all of those things if they're not correctly targeted. Direct marketers need to get better at targeting the right people to send DM to.

It's only all of those things you've stated if it doesn't interest the recipient... but if it does, it certainly doesn't him.

Scott, if you get a Direct Mail piece about a new networking philosophy book written by a Miami University grad... would you be annoyed? It was Direct Marketing... it didn't interact with you... but I bet it wouldn't annoy you because you'd probably be interested in it. Because the marketers did a good job of targeting you.

With that being said... I love the direction marketing is going with blogs, and Consumer Generated Media, etc. I totally agree with you that interaction is key. I'm a big fan of Web 2.0.

I just wanted to play devils advocate to your initial argument.

Rock on Scott!

Nick

 
At 9:02 AM, Blogger hellomynameisscott said...

Good point, Nick. I'll agree by saying "for the most part," these techniques are annoying.

Thanks man

 
At 9:41 AM, Anonymous Nick at Davis College said...

Your comments are right on target. So many people want our attention these days and none get it; unless, they find a away to become someone (the person behind the name or product) to us or your company with whom you are interested in interacting.

As for me, I would prefer my day be filled with interactions. So, I spend my time on e-mails, phone conversations and encounters with people whenever and wherever I meet them. Isn't it really about people, anyway! Scott, you are doing incredible good for so mnay people. You have a fabulous way of connecting people to people and and their resources. Thank you!

 
At 4:35 AM, Blogger Don The Idea Guy said...

Couldn't a nametag be considered an eensy-weensy personal-sized billboard? ;)

That's a small leap to a logo-printed t-shirt, which in turn is a more fashion-conscious (and less chafing) version of a sandwich board.

It's a slippery-slippery slope!
~DON

PS: Incidentally, I checked for you... the domains HELLOMYNAMEISSANDWICHBOARD.COM and HELLOMYNAMEISTSHIRT.COM are both still available. ;)

 
At 7:50 AM, Blogger Michael Daehn said...

Scott,

It is expensive and ineffective to market at the top of the relationship funnel. But if you have lots of money and no other options you can advertise to the masses. If you do, make sure your ads help bring people into a relationship (or interaction).

So if you must do a radio ad, advertise a speech you are giving so that you can meet your listeners.

Nick is right that true direct marketing is providing useful and relevant information to people that they should welcome. Most marketers have no relationship and are buying lists of names- this is not direct marketing.

Bottom line- you are right, but your ideas are a threat to the establishment.

Rock on!

 
At 8:27 PM, Anonymous Jason said...

Great post. It inspired me to write an article titled, 17 Reasons Why Podcasting is a Perfect Interactive Marketing Tool on my own blog.

Jason Van Orden

 
At 6:22 PM, Anonymous Ronald Bell said...

I totally agree that the future of marketing and advertisement has to be in interactive content. This can go for the music, movie, business, or any other genres. But at some level a bit of interruption is essential for grabbing a person.

 

Post a Comment